The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. this review we will discuss the impact of the tumor environment on viral therapy and examine some of the recent literature investigating methods of modulating this environment to enhance oncolysis. Introduction The use of viral therapy in the clinic is not a new concept, and has garnered interest for cancer treatment for several decades. In theory, an oncolytic virus (OV) can successfully destroy neoplastic cells while sparing untransformed cells. These viruses have undergone genetic modifications permitting them to infect and/or replicate exclusively in cancer cells. Over the past decade, hundreds of patients in phase I and II trials have been treated with a diverse assortment of OVs. While China has approved the worlds first oncolytic viral therapy for cancer treatment, the United States and Europe are conducting randomized phase III trials to investigate evidence of significant efficacy.1 As these first-generation oncolytic viruses continue being tested in the clinics, innovative genetic engineering approaches have permitted the design of several second and third-generation viruses, which demonstrate increased virulence in neoplastic tissue without compromising safety in animal models.2 OV treatment has also shown promise as an adjuvant to radiation therapy and classic chemotherapeutics.3 While advances in research have uncovered several novel anti-neoplastic agents, recent studies have underscored the impact of tumor microenvironment in survival, proliferation, and invasiveness of various cancers.4 The tumor microenvironment is constituted of non-transformed host stromal cells such as endothelial cells, fibroblasts, various immune cells, and a complex extra-cellular matrix (ECM) secreted by both the normal and neoplastic cells embedded in it. The significant role played by the tumor microenvironment in viral therapy is just beginning to be understood; this review will focus on changes to the tumor microenvironment subsequent to OV therapy and will discuss recent advances in exploiting these changes in YM-53601 order YM-53601 to craft more effective oncolytic YM-53601 viral treatment strategies. Angiogenesis and Oncolysis As tumors grow they require oxygen, metabolites, and waste removal in order to expand beyond a limited size. To achieve this, solid tumors commandeer the host vasculature and initiate the development of tumor vasculature by angiogenesis, the development of new blood vessels from existing endothelial cells, and/or vasculogenesis, a process involving the recruitment of endothelial progenitor cells in order to form new vasculature. Attributes of the tumor microenvironment such as hypoxia, acidosis, inflammation, and oncogene and tumor suppressor mutations disrupt the normal homeostatsis maintained between pro and antiangiogenic factors. This allows for increased secretion of pro-angiogenic growth factors, with a concurrent decrease in angiostatic factors, resulting in an angiogenic switch in favor of rapid and unrestrained vessel growth.5,6 Blood vessels born from this unregulated process are dilated, tortuous, saccular, and contain numerous arteriovenous YM-53601 shunts. The endothelial cells themselves are atypical in shape, loosely connected, and project into the lumen, causing the tumor vessels to YM-53601 be considerably leaky. Mechanical stress from rapidly proliferating cancer cells also compresses these vessels, contributing to increased resistance to blood flow.7 Thus, despite increased blood vessel density, vascular abnormalities promote heterogeneous and inefficient perfusion leading to hypoxia and acidosis throughout the tumor. The poor perfusion and reduced tissue oxygenation contributes to resistance to treatment by radiation, as well as many chemotherapeutics. In this section we will review the literature investigating the impact of OV therapy on the vasculature within the tumor microenvironment and the resulting effects on vascular perfusion. Recent studies have uncovered both pro and antiangiogenic effects of oncolytic viral therapy on tumoral angiogenesis. Most oncolytic viruses can infect and destroy proliferating tumor endothelial cells, and thus have a direct antiangiogenic effect. HOX1I Benencia et al. demonstrated the ability of (HSV) 1716, deleted for both copies of the viral 34.5 gene, to infect tumor endothelium and disrupt tumor vasculature both in vitro and in vivo.8 Interestingly, this sensitivity towards oncolysis was selective for endothelial cells purified.
Categories
- 11??-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase
- 45
- 5-HT6 Receptors
- 7-TM Receptors
- 7-Transmembrane Receptors
- Acetylcholine Nicotinic Receptors, Non-selective
- Adrenergic ??1 Receptors
- Adrenergic Related Compounds
- AHR
- Aldosterone Receptors
- Androgen Receptors
- Antiprion
- AT2 Receptors
- ATPases/GTPases
- Atrial Natriuretic Peptide Receptors
- Calcineurin
- CAR
- Carboxypeptidase
- Casein Kinase 1
- Corticotropin-Releasing Factor
- CysLT1 Receptors
- Dardarin
- Deaminases
- Death Domain Receptor-Associated Adaptor Kinase
- Delta Opioid Receptors
- DMTs
- DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase
- Dual-Specificity Phosphatase
- Dynamin
- eNOS
- ER
- G Proteins (Small)
- GAL Receptors
- General
- GLT-1
- Glucagon and Related Receptors
- Glycine Receptors
- Growth Factor Receptors
- Growth Hormone Secretagog Receptor 1a
- GTPase
- Guanylyl Cyclase
- KDM
- Kinesin
- Lipid Metabolism
- Main
- MAPK
- MCH Receptors
- Muscarinic (M2) Receptors
- NaV Channels
- Neurotransmitter Transporters
- NFE2L2
- Nitric Oxide Precursors
- Nitric Oxide Signaling
- NPFF Receptors
- Opioid
- Other
- Other MAPK
- Other Peptide Receptors
- Other Transferases
- OX1 Receptors
- OX2 Receptors
- OXE Receptors
- PAO
- Phosphatases
- Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase
- Phosphorylases
- Pim Kinase
- Polymerases
- Purine Transporters
- Sec7
- Serine Protease
- Sodium/Calcium Exchanger
- Sphingosine Kinase
- V2 Receptors
-
Recent Posts
- [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 52
- Methods and Material 2
- It has been well established that harboring the allele enhances dementia associated with Alzheimers disease (AD), and several studies have supported a role of proteolysis as an important factor that may contribute to this risk [2,3C10]
- [PubMed] [Google Scholar]Xiao YF, Ke Q, Wang SY, Auktor K, Yang Con, Wang GK, Morgan JP, Leaf A
- Although passively-administered hyperimmune serum conferred protection in intact birds [15,17,18], the contribution of innate defenses and cell-mediated immunity to the control of APEC in the avian host remains ill-defined
Tags
- 68521-88-0
- a 105-120 kDa heavily O-glycosylated transmembrane glycoprotein expressed on hematopoietic progenitor cells
- Ankrd11
- Capn1
- Carboplatin cost
- DKFZp781B0869
- HA6116
- Hdac11
- IGF2R
- INK 128 supplier
- JTK4
- LRP2
- Masitinib manufacturer
- MDA1
- Mouse monoclonal to CD34.D34 reacts with CD34 molecule
- Mouse monoclonal to ERBB3
- Mouse monoclonal to INHA
- order NVP-AEW541
- PECAM1
- Rabbit Polyclonal to AML1
- Rabbit polyclonal to AML1.Core binding factor CBF) is a heterodimeric transcription factor that binds to the core element of many enhancers and promoters.
- Rabbit Polyclonal to AQP12
- Rabbit Polyclonal to C-RAF phospho-Ser301)
- Rabbit Polyclonal to C-RAF phospho-Thr269)
- Rabbit polyclonal to CD80
- Rabbit Polyclonal to Claudin 3 phospho-Tyr219)
- Rabbit Polyclonal to CYSLTR1
- Rabbit polyclonal to DDX20
- Rabbit Polyclonal to EDG4
- Rabbit Polyclonal to FGFR2
- Rabbit Polyclonal to GAS1
- Rabbit Polyclonal to GRP94
- Rabbit polyclonal to INMT
- Rabbit Polyclonal to KAPCB
- Rabbit Polyclonal to MMP-2
- Rabbit Polyclonal to MT-ND5
- Rabbit Polyclonal to OR52E2
- Rabbit polyclonal to PHC2
- Rabbit Polyclonal to RAB31
- Rabbit Polyclonal to SLC25A31
- Rabbit Polyclonal to ZC3H13
- Rabbit polyclonal to ZNF268
- TNFRSF13C
- VAV1
- Vegfa